ACLU No Help, ACC Comments, The Opposition, New Photo, Thank you, Lies, and More
ACLU No Help
Today, I spoke with the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) legal advice line.
I was told they only have 7 attorneys for Northern California and they only accept cases that have to do with civil rights and liberties. Not to do with police or dogs.
The girl Alice was only able to take a few notes, but was unable to actually discuss Charlie’s case with me.
I can’t recall exactly what she said, but it was something to the effect … because it’s about a dog.
Please respond with a question mark and a comment …
Keep it under consideration that most of the opposition here are just “plants” by the opposing parties.
Just clones of the same people who keep coming here to make it appear like there is a following of people that actually oppose David.
You can spot them right away. Funny name. New profile. All privacy blocked. Asking very leading and strange questions. Repeating the same questions and points that are heard every time.
But never anything new. Nothing ever really significant.
With that, I understand that people may not agree or like me. I can accept that.
But I can’t accept repeated unwanted harassment, badgering, bullying, humiliating, attacks, name calling, … and somehow insinuating that I’m some type of horrible criminal that should be publicly crucified.
People that can’t be civil and supportive of this injustice to myself and Charlie will be removed. Charlie’s mom, myself, and Charlie’s family and friends have had enough.
Charlie and I are not hurting anyone.
Charlie’s family are actually real live people with feelings. We are only asking for help in what many … many people know and feel is a complete and utter injustice and travesty.
Look at Charlie’s left rear leg.
I would like to publicly acknowledge and thank the following people for their action, care, love, support, and gifts.
Thank you for standing up for the rights of animals, human beings, giving animals a voice, and for helping other animals like Charlie who are abused, neglected, and targeted unfairly and ordered killed without merit.
For the month of January 2013
Maria G. $10
Gayle M $1
June B $10
Karen L $1
Elena L $3
Carolyn L $5
Donna P $1
Audra G $1
Saundra G $5
Michelle M $1
Ashley O $1
Stephanie C $5
Lydia P $3
Berta M $1
Stained Glass $40
Susan M $20
Robert B $25
Ian H $5
Sherry Z $10
Taryn B $25
Studio D $15
Alexander L $2
Jonette B $25
Janice M $20
Michele D $2
Beau Ballet $5
Sandra L $5.05
Mack K $25
Barbara L $1
marianne P $25
Laura S $1
Joshua B $20
Angela L $50
Mona D $20
Zaida G $5
Cynthia D $10
Marie M $5
Traci H $5
Jolanta W $1
Tina T $25
Christine B $20
Monka B $10
Suzan H $10
Maureen C $5 GBP
Mona D $26
Susan W $3
Janine E $5
Blue Waters $103
Deb M $10
Pamela M $2
Margaret A $5
Yuriko K $100
Shoe Fits $5
Manuela R $50
Jose F $10
Animal Rescue $20
Marianne L $10
John Z $5
“Help save Charlie, the REAL deal Tina – Charlie was microchipped by SFACC in June following David’s arrest for elder abuse of his 70 year old stepfather in his Mother’s/Stepfather’s home. This is no special, GPS microchip. David is one again playing on the ignorance of people.
12 hours ago · 3 … ”
HSC, tRD gets this record from an ACC database of notes that they take while in the performance of their jobs. ACC also included this information in the court record.
However, the man is NOT my stepfather. The man “admittedly” busted into my room through a locked door and attacked me with a metal pole. It was self defense.
The case was dismissed and I was fully exonerated.
The interesting part about this one sided information is that ACC included this in the record to “salt” the record and to make me appear like a bad guy.
… but this has nothing to do with Charlie and him being declared vicious and dangerous! This doesn’t prove that I am a bad person or irresponsible dog owner. This doesn’t prove Charlie’s guilt or my guilt in this corrupt vicious dog hearing.
This is simply an outright attempt to slander, discredit, manipulate, corrupt, “hurt”, provoke, and distort the truth.
It’s heartless and cruel.
David picked Charlie up immediately
Charlie and Charlie’s mom
Dear Help Save Charlie,
I hope your day is going well.
Today I am back to work to right many wrongs in Charlie’s case. Justice has been denied in every aspect of Charlie’s case, as well as mine.
There has been no replies to my calls and voice mails to the San Francisco City Attorney’s office or San Francisco Animal Control.
Back on January 14th, I received information that Charlie had already been moved to a new location prior to me proposing a placement as stipulated in the agreement and ordered by the Federal court.
“Help save Charlie, the REAL deal
8 hours ago
Charlie Update (January 14, 2013 @ 11:47 p.m.):
It has been confirmed that Charlie has been moved out of his kennel and is in transit to a new location. We know that Charlie’s supporters are anxious for photos and additional information, but the priority for Charlie’s caretakers is for him to get settled in and decompress. We’ll post more information soon. Go Charlie! … “
This information has already been forwarded to all parties including Federal Magistrate Nathaniel Cousins with no reply.
Meanwhile, we keep getting photos posted on another Facebook page of a non-aggressive Charlie at a new unknown location. Charlie is on a leash being photographed with no indication of viciousness, a dog that is dangerous, or a dog that is out of control.
However, it’s important to note that the photos have no date and no location. The photos could be old. No member of the public has seen Charlie in about 6 months. Nobody has provided proof that Charlie is even alive.
Even if Charlie is alive, isn’t it odd that another party is receiving photos of him? Isn’t it odd that no one can see him or check on his health? Isn’t it odd that I haven’t been able to see him for 6 months?
What law or right does SF and ACC have to treat people like this?
Finally, I want you to know that there is nothing in the agreement that says Charlie cannot be returned to me. The 3rd party has full authority to return Charlie to me should they feel it appropriate.
Charlie’s case has been settled and that means the vicious and dangerous declaration is null and void. Both parties have a mutual release of all claims.
Much more information coming soon.
Charlie loves you.
Take action, send a gift, support animal rights.